Tag: Beyond Soundbites

General Conference and the Call to Stop Giving

Another post in the series – Beyond Soundbites and Towards Holy Conferencing (A Series on the Actions of General Conference). This series includes the topics of Abortion, Clergy Qualifications, Marriage, Israel, Pronouns, and Disaffiliation.

It is a common reaction: “I don’t want my money going to something I can’t support.”  In response, I want to start with a perspective on giving in general, using my Annual Conference as an example. Several years ago, our Conference moved away from a traditional apportionment model to a Tithe Initiative, expecting each congregation to tithe. I love the model and witness that this provides.

The tithe represents first fruits, given to support the larger community.  The tithe reminds us that we are a part of something bigger than ourselves.  As we give in this way, we put our trust in the collective wisdom of the community.  We invest in the common good. We give up personal control.  And in turn we are blessed beyond measure. The countable funds overflow in abundance and our hearts are opened to the “immeasurable riches of God’s grace.” (Eph 2:7).   That’s the hope of this spiritual discipline.

Tithing is a way to acknowledge that we are “the Body of Christ and individually members of it.”  (I Cor 12:27).  With our first fruits, we build up the whole body with its many and diverse parts, gifts, perspectives, and contexts.  At this first level of giving, the goal is not personal engagement with all the ways the resources might be used; the goal is the expansion of ministry and growth in love – love that is patient and kind and serves with a humility that does not insist on its own way. (I Cor 13:4-8).  Our giving leads to this transformation within.  As a word of caution, withholding can lead to hardness of heart.

At this level of giving, we give beyond our “party,” be it political or theological.  We acknowledge that the word “party” is built on the word “part.”  We can make a loose connection with taxes and a commitment to the united work of the nation. To only give to support a “part,” or to stop giving because of a disagreement, is dangerous. It can become a disease that infects the whole, opening the way to the destructive spirits of fear, mistrust, division, and other spiritual cancers.

Biblically and positively, we are called to give in a way that illuminates the wideness of God’s mercy.  We put our trust in the living God who is at work for good among us, who is “above all and through all and in all.” (Eph 4:6).  The call is to clothe ourselves “with compassion, kindness, humility, meekness, and patience, bearing with one another, dealing with complaints with forgiveness, and to clothe ourselves, above all, with love which binds everything together in perfect harmony.” (Col 3:12-17).  We are to give in this spirit and to promote this witness (See II Cor 9:6-8).  If we only support those things within our narrow level of comfort, and seek to build that up, we miss out on the opportunity to practice this kind of love.

Giving in this way helps us to “grow up,” and keep from being “tossed to and fro and blown about by every wind of doctrine, by people’s trickery, by their craftiness in deceitful scheming.”  As we give in this way, we build up the whole body, “joined and knit together,” with each part promoting “the body’s growth in building itself up in love.” (Eph 4:1-16).  We are called to give in support of this kind of growth.  With our first gifts, we are called to give into the community as a whole, and in support of all we share in common.  And practically speaking, it helps to realize that, on the whole, a very small percentage might go to that one thing that we don’t like.

As a spirit of schism and division moves among us, with the promotion of parts rather than the whole, one way to avoid the trickery and scheming that Paul talks about is to move beyond soundbites and towards holy conferencing.  That’s the title of this series.  I believe it is also a way to characterize the calling we have been given.  Soundbites on the actions of General Conference – on the topics of abortion, Israel, marriage, ordination, and more — are often meant to stir up more division.  Giving as God intends, in faith, is a way to grow up and to be blessed by the “immeasurable riches of God’s grace.” 

Beyond the tithe, we also promote offerings, where individuals give to specific projects or causes that are dear to them. This is a good thing.  There is room within the whole body for parts to be promoted and supported. However, from a larger perspective, we bring harm to the whole body when we place a priority on these gifts rather than seeing our offerings as over and above the giving of first fruits.  This creates stress on the whole, and can lead to an unhealthy competition between parts, driven by a spirit of scarcity rather than abundance. 

At General Conference, we did approve a 42% decrease in our connectional budget.  While there are many factors that lead to this reality, one is disaffiliation and schism within the larger body.   As we build again, there is a need to repair the fractures among us.  What would it look like if this was our focus, as opposed to giving energy to the continuing efforts to divide?  How can we “grow up,” and do a better job at being the people that God has called us to be?  How can we expand the table rather than shrink it down to our comfort zone? How can we glorify God rather than our own opinions?  To use an image from Wesley, to build a community around a “part,” rather than the whole, is not only to build our house on sand, but on the froth of the sea.

General Conference and Disaffiliation/Reaffiliation

Another post in the series – Beyond Soundbites and Towards Holy Conferencing (A Series on the Actions of General Conference). This series includes the topics of Abortion, Clergy Qualifications, Marriage, Israel, and Pronouns.

Paragraph 2553 is no longer an option for disaffiliation. And it is true that General Conference did not approve another plan where congregations could disaffiliate based on disagreements with certain positions in the Book of Discipline. General Conference did approve a Reaffiliation Plan to welcome churches home and to offer opportunities to rejoin the United Methodist Church.  In some ways, these two acts could be seen as sides of the same coin.

There may still be ways to bless those who want to leave the denomination, and processes could be developed, but looking at these two decisions together, the hope would be for something very different than what we found with 2553. This paragraph, inserted in 2019, caused great harm.  It forced us to focus on division rather than unity, disagreements rather than building community, and voting rather than discernment, with a winner-take-all outcome. It assumed that churches were objects that could easily be moved, when in fact the old saying is true – the church is the people.  It divided families, friends, and communities. It continued to turn siblings in Christ into issues and problems. It promoted the use of political tactics that do not honor the calling we have been given – to practice the love of Christ, with patience, kindness, and a humility that does not insist on its own way. If we are to be faithful, we can’t be in the business of schism based on disagreements.  This is not who we are called to be.  (See Eph 4:1-3; I Cor 13:4-8; Col 3:12-17, for starters).  

It may be helpful to note that those who disagreed with our policies around human sexuality between 1972 and 2024, did not have an exit plan, nor was one requested.  That was not the focus.  The focus was on advocacy, conferencing, and working for change, hopefully in a spirit of holy love and commitment to the Body of Christ.   As one who would identify as more conservative on these issues, said to one who had worked for these changes (me), “You didn’t leave when you were in the minority all those years.  I admire that. Why would I leave now.”

Another factor in not developing a new exit plan based on disagreement is the overall movement towards contextual freedom, rather than forced agreement.  With the actions of General Conference, pastors and congregations have more ability to engage in ministry in their particular contexts, as led by the Holy Spirit. The hope is to live more completely into the Wesleyan spirit of learning how to love alike, even if we don’t think alike about everything. 

To live into this hope, it is important to move beyond soundbites and mischaracterizations that are often intended to create more division.  (This has been the motivation of this whole series).  To review one example, we can point to the accusation that we now say that it is okay for single persons to have sex.  This is based on the removal of the line, “fidelity in marriage and celibacy in singleness.”  This phrase was a part of the qualifications for ordination.  The soundbite ignores the statement that replaced this one. In what is arguably a stronger statement, the call is to practice “fidelity, monogamy, commitment, mutual affection and respect, careful and honest communication, mutual consent, and growth in the grace and in the knowledge and love of God.” The point, in this context, is the kind of character and witness we want from our pastoral leaders, rather than focusing on a marriage license.   And still, if legal marriage is the concern, we can note that it is affirmed in multiple places in our doctrine and discipline, as the best way to live out this character and to provide the needed legal protections for both spouses and children involved. 

If we assume the worst in people, there may be ways to justify behaviors that would not be approved by some, but that could be true with the previous statement as well.  People could have claimed that they were not “single,” or turned to the traditional definition of celibacy as meaning “unmarried.” But that was rarely a concern because the primary purpose of the previous statement was to keep some out.  As the new statement stands, a high and holy calling is lifted up for all.  There is certainly nothing here to warrant schism.

Moving beyond soundbites and towards holy conferencing is key to life-giving discernment.  To do this in a way that honors Christ and our calling, we must find ways to limit the false accusations that cause so much harm – including the claims that we now promote immorality, or don’t believe in the resurrection or in the Bible (on this one I would invite you to read the post, “Wesley and Human Sexuality (and his commentary on often cited verses).”  If it is up to the Annual Conference to develop a process, strong safeguards must be developed to guide us in a much better direction than we experienced with 2553. 

To consider a request to exit the denomination, a review of key sections of the Book of Discipline might be in order, including our Doctrinal Statements, The General Rules, The Ministry of All Christians, and the section on the Local Church. Based on this understanding of who we are, the questions might be: What is it that leads you to a desire to move in a different direction – beyond one concern over recent decisions, which do not force any changes in how a congregation engages in ministry?  Is the room for mutual support?  Is there a way to come to an agreement that does not dishonor the sacrifices of generations and a future United Methodist witness within the community?

As was mentioned, General Conference called upon every Annual Conference to develop a plan for Reaffiliation, in a “spirit of grace.” This is what we are about! Welcoming! Practicing Hospitality! Supporting one another in mission! Being in ministry together, as a part of a connection that is larger than our own expression! Learning how to love alike, even if we don’t think alike about everything! Understanding that a methodist is not distinguish by our opinions or styles, but by the love of God written upon our hearts, to paraphrase Wesley’s words.  This is who we are!

We would love to help congregations that previously disaffiliated, to begin a process of discernment, which might include an assessment of the General Book of Discipline and our core understanding of who we are, along with an understanding of what it means to be a part of a connection.  Stay tuned for more information, as this process is developed.